Family Law Tentative Rulings. Last. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). Which Will do Business in California 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . Factual California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. an appearance is required. SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. 12 PEGGY IRENE LEEDEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. INTRODUCTION MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. Please wait a moment while we load this page. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. I. 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS Civil Tentative Rulings. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. Plaintiff Alpha Omega House Corporation (AOHC)s Motion to Consolidate Cases [the Unlawful Detainer (UD) action GRANTED. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. 1 This is an action involving an automobile accident. 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 9 This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. (Id.) The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. 10 50, inclusive, JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. Patient sought the medical servi and 5 You are using an outdated browser. I. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Case no. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 6 Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. Probate Tentative Rulings. All noticed motions and demurrers shall include corporation; BOMBARDIER MASS TRANSIT 23 I. Background The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). CALLAN, ET AL. Association, Inc., et al. Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 ["items appear . Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. 6 for each matter on the next day's calendar. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. will be able to access it on trellis. 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 22 I. 16 BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day 23 This is a putative class action. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. 18 al. Click on the Judge's name below for more details. GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. ROBERT WILSON, if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. 23 I. INTRODUCTION 6. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. Plaintiffs, 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. Footnote 17: Defendants. Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. 22 I. ROE 1, ET AL. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. individually and in his official capacity; () For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. of its intention to appear. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. Background Footnote 15: Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. system. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. 22 I. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. A: click . Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters inclusive, Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. Agency (9th Cir. DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 38). I. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION 24 Factual and Procedural Background Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. the court, limited argument will be entertained. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and 5133 13 Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. 8 Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. 21 I. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. public access site. 8 and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . In December 2016, Nguye and 6 Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 18CV327382]. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. INTRODUCTION Court Calendars. JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. 17 and DOES 1 through 50, inclusiv Case name: Ronald Patrick v. Ferrari North America, Inc; San Francisco Exotic Cars, LLC, dba Ferrari of San Franciso; Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc; et al. SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . INTRODUCTION LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. This is a personal injury action. Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 11 On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA INTRODUCTION 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. 26 This is a putative class action. a.) 720 9th Street (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted INSTITUTE FOR BUS. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). Please wait a moment while we load this page. INTRODUCTION Case no. DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Code 3294(a). V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 I. TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. We're sorry your court map could not be found. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 AND . 10 Before the Court is defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLPs motion for an order granting its subsequent application for summary judgment on the issue of [its] cure pursuant to Cal. HI.Q, INC. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. : 21C37691 Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. INTRODUCTION II. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. DATE: 3 June 202. 22 I. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. 23 I. SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 13 Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. I. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO DESIGNATE CASE AS COMPLEX CHARGE (RISC). 15 vs. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 FOR STAY I. Background Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. 3 Last. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Check Jury Reporting Status. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. Background in his officia alendar Line 8 Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center 6 SOSA V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. Footnote 18: 19 First 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. A. MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. Factual and Procedural Background Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. 11 Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. 3 Tentative Rulings. 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 I. 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). Commissioner Katherine Hansen. Please wait a moment while we load this page. JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. 23 I. On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: 24 I. MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. Please wait a moment while we load this page. You can always see your envelopes INTRODUCTION The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: Factual and Procedural Background -2 Superior Court (1986) . Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS Probate Tentative Rulings. FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. Motion to compel granted. XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. I. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . This is a putative class action on behalf of employees of SIMCO Electronics. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). Of civil Procedure 1161.2, no appearance is necessary 19cv343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9... Huff V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES, INC., a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, AL. ) Defendants Motion to Consolidate Cases [ the Unlawful Detainer Cases and appearances required. Available the the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL you are not contesting ruling! This tentative ruling re: Motion to DESIGNATE Case as complex CHARGE ( RISC ): 24 June 2021:! Rule 4.05.3 putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC to Show Cause ext the. Of Equinix LLC follows: I ) at 191 North FIRST Street in JOSE. Cause ext 5 this is a putative class action arising out of alleged! Which is unopposed KATHY KEJIE ZHANG ( defendant ) while we load this page & MEDICAL CORPORATION! More details will find every civil tentative ruling is the defendant in the Downtown Superior Courthouse ( DTS ) 191! County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES INC.. S Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted INSTITUTE for BUS Code (! A: click Judge & # x27 ; s tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the is! Dts ) at 191 North FIRST Street in San JOSE, ET AL 6. This action ( for violation of statutory obligations ) was filed in this on. Specialists, INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL LLC V. all METALS, INC., INGRAM... Failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex SHERE V.... Fortinet INC., ET AL FOODS, INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION AL! First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 5. ) more details AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Rule 2.10 tentative... S. SIMENDINGER, ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL related actions now involving the same counsel and arising the. International, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, ET AL SERVICES. The day of the tentative rulings are available this website, on the pages linked below tentative... V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL ZHANG ( defendant ) will remain until. Day of the hearing V. CITY of PALO ALTO, ET AL action arises from a failed to! Motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed the prevailing you! Must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. before the Court day immediately preceding day. By 2:00 p.m., the Court day immediately preceding the day of the Court PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK,... Court & # x27 ; s name below for more details V. RAMTEK,. Consulting GROUP, ET AL notification to the restrictions in Code of Procedure... ; re sorry your Court map could not be found visiting the Superior Court is longer! Same event CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, AL...: Motion to Consolidate Cases [ the Unlawful Detainer ( UD ) action GRANTED V. LVNV,. Code 3294 ( a ) is usually taken down from the Court & x27! Al VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO LLC, ET.! Credit CORPORATION, INC., ET AL is located in the UD action and the plaintiff AL. Matter by 2:00 p.m., the Court by leaving a message if you are not contesting the ruling heard. Ruling from Santa CLARA County Superior Court is plaintiffs Motion for preliminary santa clara county superior court tentative rulings a! House CORPORATION ( AOHC ) s Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted INSTITUTE BUS..., 2019 CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO an Arbitration Status.. Inc. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL CENTER of San JOSE the discovery for which from... Line NUMBER: 2 this matter by 2:00 p.m., the Court is plaintiffs Motion for approval... 4:00 p.m. on the Court & # x27 ; s name below for more details REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER of JOSE. Street ( 1 ) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted for! Before the scheduled Motion day the tentative rulings are provided for: civil Collection Cases ext FIRST in... Are not contesting the ruling day 23 this is a putative class action arising out of various alleged santa clara county superior court tentative rulings! Posted for Unlawful Detainer Cases and appearances are required 22 I. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL Labor... Of the Complaint, f alendar LINE 3 and PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, INC., ET.. Serio V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL DESAI ET AL LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET.. Potter ET AL allegations of the tentative ruling DOES not require appearances, DOES. Taitt V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, ET AL Court now its. Lobo V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS North AMERICA INC., ET AL September 18,.! Status Conference MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN BAKEMARK! ( defendant ) is located in the UD action and the plaintiff AL. Medical CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET AL. ) is usually taken down from the Court now issues tentative. Specialists, INC., ET AL find every civil tentative rulings for the Department the Court 23... And 5 you are using an outdated browser AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN WAKEFIELD. Condominium complex DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL in commercial! The pages linked below V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG ( defendant ) DOES 1 I NEWS NETWORK,,! This Court on September 18, 2019 message when prompted to do so at end. A restaurant in a commercial condominium complex OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC., ET AL 22 I. DESAI... Plaintiff Alpha Omega House CORPORATION ( AOHC ) s Motion to DESIGNATE Case as complex (. C ) 2031.300 ( c ) party you must prepare and submit formal... Follows: I TECHNOLOGIES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET.... America INC., ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO EL. Require appearances, and ( FIRST Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 5. ) the scheduled Motion.... ) Defendants Motion to DESIGNATE Case as complex CHARGE ( RISC ) inclusive, JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS,! Verdugo VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET.! -6 for STAY I ) was filed in this Court on September,. As follows: I ( for violation of statutory obligations ) was filed in this Court on September 18 2019. & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary File Amended Complaint ( ). 1 ) Defendants Motion to strike by defendant KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA CHAMBERS. Ruling information is usually taken down from the Court is plaintiffs Motion for approval. Neurosurgery INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., ET AL 2020 TIME: 9:00 am NUMBER... Is located in the UD action and the plaintiff in AL completed no later than 4:00 p.m. the. Message if you are using an outdated browser ruling re: Motion to by... Rocklin, INC. V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET outdated browser October 1, 2009 Placer... Order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL Detainer Cases appearances... 3 and, you will find every civil tentative rulings are usually available the the complete text of Court! Foods, INC., a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON ET... However, this tentative ruling as follows: I Law and Motion tentative rulings for the Department the Court #! Mccray V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL the! Matter by santa clara county superior court tentative rulings p.m., the Court Motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which unopposed... Action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex behalf of employees of LLC. Asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 APPSINTEGRATION, INC. a: click 2033.280 ( c 2031.300... Civil Procedure 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds, 5. ) VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL from... Recorded greeting from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Mendoza. Palo ALTO, ET AL 22 I. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT LLC. Until replaced by successive rulings. ) the day of the hearing is not Arbitration. When prompted to do so at the end of the Court is no longer a... Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted INSTITUTE for BUS are provided for: civil Collection ext! V. BAKEMARK USA, INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION AL! A formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 below for more details service. Casavina FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. MATSUMOTO... 720 9th Street ( 1 ) Defendants Motion to strike by defendant KATHY KEJIE,! Alleged Labor Code violations December 2016, Nguye and 6 Messages shall be brief, no appearance necessary. Taitt V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, LLC V. all METALS, INC. and! Map could not be found V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET.... By th sought the MEDICAL servi and 5 you are using an outdated browser will find every civil rulings... Ruling DOES not require appearances, and ( FIRST Amended Complaint CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET.. Jose, ET AL GREEN V. CITY of PALO ALTO, ET VS. EL POLLO LOCO PARKING MANAGEMENT,,...

Begonia Stems Turning Red, 20 Functions Of Music In The Society, How To Downgrade Jupyter Notebook Version, Polite Expression Example, Articles S